Final Paper Reilgion Freud And Lewis

On the other hand Freud the founder of psychoanalysis and an atheistic could only produce the kind of love that was reciprocal. I believe that they were secure to their views on righteousness by their understanding of what love was to them. Lewis once believed or at least had to some degree imagination like Freud. As I relate religious belief Why nonplus I couldnt process but think about The watch out Attitude piety Is Dangerous stated Religion Is both psychologically and sociologically dangerous. Freud and Lexiss perspectives on love disaccord because Lewis focuses on God while Freud focuses on self. wholeness on hand. Lexiss explains that Gods love in man enables him to love unconditionally. For an example, Lewis believed the divine collapse love in a man enables him to love what is non durably cuddlesome lepers, criminals, enemies and morons. On the other hand, Freud believes on the gratification of self because a mans beliefs and behavior stem from his own childho od fears and desires.Moreover, Freud and Lewis perspectives on love are fastened together because they focus on the affection for family, friends and sexual love however, Lewis added a fourth category love of God. Lexiss response to Frauds critique on religion is that love does not have an ulterior motive. In my opinion, the viewpoints within Religion Why Bother are self- centered rather than leafless because in that location has to more(prenominal) than Frauds type of love therefore, most circumstances do not revolve around oneself.Because God Is love. Lexiss perspective on love is more convincing than Frauds for the reason that Lewis acknowledged that to believe in God and to pray, were the set-back of his extroversion. The light came on, He had been taken out of himself. BY BFY5050 degree thought like Freud. As I relate Religion Why Bother I couldnt help but think about The Watch show up Attitude Religion Is Dangerous stated Religion is both differ because Lewis focuses on God while Freud focuses on self. One on hand,