Psychology- Prejudice Essay

1. Evaluate Tajfels core as received in terms of streotypes and weakness 10 Prejudice and Discrimination have been perpetually controversial and it has become one of the crucial topics in the world of societal Psychology. Henry Tajfel was a British social psychology who is well cognise for his SIT or Social Identity Theory Inter root word Discrimination (1970). This opening has been useful to identify the social causes of prejudice and as well as explaining individual differences. First of all, this study is aimed to show or demonstrate that barely putting or diving populate into groups could cause them to discriminate the new(prenominal) group.Tajfels procedure of the experiment involved two research laboratory experiments. The subjects of the for the first time experiment contained 64 boys, 14 and 15 year-old from a school in Bristol. The boys from each group knew each other well, since they were actually in the alike houses at the school. The second experiment was simi lar to the first one, since 48 students as well as already knew each other. In terms of stereotypes and his study, Tajfel proposed that Stereotyping or putting people into groups is based on a normal cognitive we tend to group or categories things.By the statement, he meant that we see the people in our group are just the same with us because there are certain similarities that makes us parallel with them and therell be a tendency of us calling the same people us and those who are different or out-group them. This study also has its weaknesses and strengths. One of the strengths Laboratory experiment method, which makes him to able tyrannical the environment in terms of what the subjects had experienced during the test, therefore he chamberpot ensure that there are no influences that would change their behaviour subsequently on.Manipulation of the environment also makes him able to obtain replication delinquent to its standardness in procedures. However, since all of the partic ipants were all male, similar age and came from the same country. In terms of experiment, this study has become biased. It is difficult to decide whether it is good ample to be generalised, due to its gender, age and geographical limitations. The ecological validity is doubtful, considering the experiments were lab studies, where we can jump to an argument that this involved unusual task is held in artificial environment.In other words, the participants acted in the way they thought was demanded of them pick up Characteristic. This experiment deals with a disruptive and anti-social, very general commons of high society in explaining and understanding the causes of prejudice and discrimination. Moreover, this piece of research could be advantageous or helpful to our daily life. Nevertheless, the applications are still limited, regard to ecological validity and the gender, race and cultures.