Stalin: In the Wrong? :: essays research papers

Stalin, by patchy mint today, would be considered a horrible man who had caused much harm to the world. This, of course, is in modern terms. History has a representation of reshaping the morality of events over a period of sequence. Take, for example, the Crusades. The majority of Europeans at the time vastly agreed with their purpose. Now, however, they are seen as a religious draws abuse of power and an unfortunate loss of life. Will the same reversal occur with the view of Stalin? After all, he did completely influence a backwards society. Since we can non conceivable travel into the future, Stalin analyzeament be assessed from acclaimed people of the past. These people get out have no prejudice towards Stalin in their ideals because they will not have cognize of Stalin nor the Soviet Union. However, their overall opinions will not fluctuate based on Stalin and thus Stalin will be judged. Stalin will be evaluated by the following three distinguished historical intelle ctuals Plato, Machiavelli and Sir crowd G. Frazer.The first person we shall introduce to judge Stalin is the Athenian philosopher Plato. Plato, in his talk in the First Book of The Laws, suggests a very honest, yet effective, test for selecting and educating men who can be trusted as statesmen. This test, which later became known as the wine test, was supportive of Platos views. It was not simply overflowing to be a wise ex-soldier, as many people guess Plato choose them to be the most qualified. In the dialogue, Plato states that drunkenness loosen ups a mans tongue, which gives the presents public an idea what he is really like. By this simple test, Plato would readily support Stalin. Stalin was well-known to drink everyone else under the table. In fact, Stalin imbibed much more than his fellow British counterpart, Sir Winston Churchill, and his successor, Khrushchev. Stalin, being a Georgian, took commodious pride in his raising on a diet of mouton and wine, and as he grew , found wine not potent enough, preferring to obliterate vodka. Wine, he tell, was merely juice. Stalin, when he drank, rarely fluctuated from what he said when he was sober, proving to be a very consistent man. However, the people that he had at his little get-togethers were not, and often he used the information obtained here to purge later victims. Plato saw the wine test not as a means for him or others to get drunk, but instead loosen the tongue.